The Iraqi forces’ current offensive on ISIS in the city of Tikrit
has been taking place without the help of US airstrikes as the US seemed uneasy
about the increasingly sectarian nature behind the involvement of Iranian
Shiite forces. It is thought that over two-thirds of the current Iraqi forces
are made up of Shiite militias and that the Iranian Major General, Qassim
Suleimani, is playing an influential role in the campaign. Iran’s Revolutionary
Guard Corps are also reported to be present in the fight, operating heavy weaponry.
Although not confirmed, it is thought that the growing role of Iranian forces
and the high volume of Shiite militia fighters may be the reason for the lack
of airstrikes. However, it is evident that this conflict, which was supposed to
be liberating Iraq from ISIS, is instead creating a platform for a large-scale
sectarian conflict. And the coalition has been very slow to realise the severity
of this situation.
Sectarian violence from Shiite militias has been rife and at
times comparable to that of ISIS. Last week a video of a young boy being
executed was released online. His executioners were soldiers with the Iraqi
flags on their arms and they could be heard calling for others to join the
Shiite militias. This is not an isolated incident and Amnesty International
released a report in October 2014 on the frequent abductions and killings of
Sunni civilians by Shia militias. Iraq’s prime minister, Haider al-Abadi has
condemned and forbidden such sectarian violence but has been unable to prevent
it.
Of course, the actions of ISIS have been fuelling sectarian fears
and divisions. In June 2014, an ISIS twitter feed displayed pictures of
hundreds of dead Shiites in Tikrit, surrounded by their ISIS killers. It is
therefore inevitable that the thought of large Shia militias entering Tikrit provokes
worries of vengeful, sectarian violence - particularly in the light of recent examples
such as the execution of the young boy.
History seems to repeat itself in Iraq. Saddam Hussein and
his Ba’ath party consistently oppressed the Shiite majority and when he finally
fell in 2003, a process of de-Baathification only served to polarise Iraqi
politics. Since Saddam’s fall, Sunni politicians have been marginalised, particularly
by previous Prime Minister, Nouri Maliki and in recent years many have been
accused of terrorism – including former Vice-president, Tariq al-Hashemi, who
was even sentenced to death although he managed to flee the country before
charges could be brought against him.
Since 2003 sectarian tensions have intensified and for many
Sunnis, resentment towards the government has been building. As a result there have
consistently been sectarian clashes across the country, from Sunni insurgencies
in the aftermath of Saddam’s fall to more recent clashes in Anbar province. Shiite
military groups like Imam Ali Brigade and the Freeman of Mosul are leaving
notes on the doorsteps of Sunni households with threats of an-eye-for-an-eye
retribution. Regardless of whether these families are associated with ISIS, they
fear becoming targets. Even some Yazidis who were ruthlessly persecuted and
once co-existed peacefully with the Sunnis are pledging vengeance, quoting they
will “never trust them again.”
The absence of a political process to accompany the air
strikes is instead driving Sunni communities to consider allying with ISIS.
However, reconciliation cannot take place without the complete removal of ISIS,
the Shiites alone cannot defeat them. Some argue that if the Sunni tribes are
armed then ISIS will not last a month. But there is simply no trust left
between the communities.
It is for this reason that avoiding sectarian violence on
the part of the Iraqi forces is of such importance. It will only serve to
create further divisions and therefore give the opportunity for ISIS to be seen
as protectors and liberators of the Sunni minority. It must not be allowed to
descend into a sectarian civil war. If divisions continue to intensify then it
could lead to a conflict that would continue long after the planned expulsion
of ISIS.
No comments:
Post a Comment